[TEXT ONLY] |
![]()
|
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This document is a summary of a printed document. The printed document may contain charts and photographs which are not reproduced in this electronic version. If you require the printed version of this document, contact the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, or call (202) 693-5116. This report reflects the findings of the Office of Inspector General at the time that the audit report was issued. More current information may be available as a result of the resolution of this audit by the Department of Labor program agency and the auditee. For further information concerning the resolution of this report's findings, please contact the program agency. OIG has started using Acrobat 4.0 to prepare it's latest Audit reports. If you are experiencing problems downloading some of the larger PDF files, you may want to download the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the link provided below.
The OIG conducted an audit to
determine whether current policies and practices of the Dislocated Worker
(DW) program resulted in the targeted population being served. We found
that DW programs were not predominantly serving persons who were victims
of plant closings or mass layoffs and 35 percent of program participants
were ineligible or documentation was insufficient to establish their
eligibility. In addition, we believe that the allocation methodology may
not distribute funds where they are most needed.
We recommended that the Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training:
We also recommended that the Assistant Secretary
require the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) staff to complete
a periodic, comprehensive quality review and oversight of data entered
into participant information systems to ensure placements are valid and
data are entered in accordance with program guidance and are otherwise
accurate and complete.
While ETA generally agreed with many of our
recommendations, they did not agree with our conclusions or much of the
data on which they were based. ETA agreed to work with state and local
governments to ensure that files adequately document participants'
eligibility and also plans to increase DW program technical assistance and
monitoring activities. In addition, ETA's response indicated that a review
of the DW program's distribution formula may be completed as a part of a
mandated review of the Workforce Investment Act's (WIA) allocation formula
for the adult program. The response does not indicate a willingness to
provide additional guidance on program eligibility. However, ETA indicated
that it will increase its efforts to ensure WIA program data are accurate
and believes the use of UI wage data will help eliminate some of the
errors identified in our review. |
Privacy and Security Statement -- DISCLAIMER
Send technical comments to:
Webmaster@oig.dol.gov
|