APPENDIX A
 
 
 
UST'S RESPONSE TO THE TENTATIVE FINDINGS
 
 

 
 
 
 
UNITED SIOUX TRIBES
OF SOUTH DAKOTA
Development Corporation
P. 0. Box 11 93
Pierre, SD 57501
* Standing Rock                   Crow Creek
* Lower Brule -                     Pine Ridge
* Fort Totten                        Cheyenne
* Flandreau                          Sisseton
* Rosebud                           Yankton
* Santee
Administration                                 224-1375
Employment Assistance                   224-8861
Appraisals                                        224-8860
J.T.P.A.                                            224-8865
Natural Resources                            224-8864
 

December 17, 1997
 
 

Mr. Jerome J. Subkow
Director, Office of Grant
and Contract Audits
Office of Inspector General
Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Mr. Subkow:

Enclosed is our response to your draft report of the tentative findings to your audit of United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation (UST) JTPA Section 401 (Title IV-A and Title 11-B) program for the period of July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1997.

Introduction

We have reviewed the tentative findings of the audit. During the audit field work we responded to all inquiries presented by the auditors with the idea of trying to resolve the issues before they were incorporated in the draft report. We do not believe the responses provided by the Corporation were considered before the report was drafted. Consequently the questioned costs should not have been included in the

1


report. The audit resulted from complaints of fraud and wrong doing by disgruntled employees and clients. The fraud investigation caused a hardship on the Corporation because all financial records of the Corporation were seized and retained by the Inspector General for more than a year. When the investigation could not find evidence of fraud, then the Department of Labor audit and investigation in an effort to save face downgraded the fraud investigation to a financial and compliance audit. The auditors did not understand the program because they ignored the definitions of training assistance and supportive services when they arrived at questioned costs. We did follow our Comprehensive Annual Plan (CAP) and operated the JTPA program accordingly.
 

FINDING 1.     Administrative expenses exceed 20 percent ceiling
                          ($225,998 Questioned).

The auditors reclassified Training Assistance costs to administrative costs. Due to this reclassification of costs, the administrative cost ceiling of 20 percent was exceeded. The auditors did not indicate that the expenditures were unallowable JTPA costs.
 
 

2


Corporation Comment

Host Agency Agreement determines the type of training the JTPA client receives from his period of training assistance under the JTPA program. The JTPA Program Administrator determines where he trains and how he receives training. Also, the type of cash assistance he receives during the training period.

The Executive Director is the Personnel Manager who determines the hiring and firing of all JTPA employees in the Personnel Policies and Procedures at United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation. The Program Administrator can only make a recommendation of who may be hired or fired as it relates to the program. The job duties of the Program Administrator are client job development, counseling and orientation before placing individuals with the Host Agency.

Administrative Secretary kept pace with the training needs and the type of orientation the client received. The individual did intake on clients as well as determined income information as needed for job development services under the JTPA program. Administrative Secretary went out at different times to do job development for
 
 

3


potential clients and further did job orientation including counseling with incoming clients at the intake level.

The purpose of having the Program Administrator and Administrative Secretary under Training Assistance category is that they were accomplishing job development, counseling, client intake, job search assistance, job referral and placement to meet the vocational exploration needs of the client. Even the Executive Director talks to potential employers as well as the Program Administrator and Administrative Secretary about the recurring employment for the Native American clients with the employers.

The Program Administrator and Administrative Secretary should have never been reclassified by the auditors as these two staff people under Training Assistance meet the qualifications of the JTPA program and the cost should not have been questioned. The questioned cost of the Training Assistance category was never questioned by the JTPA project representatives in the past as they determined the cost was legitimate since 1980.

Finding 2.         JTPA Charged with Costs Associated with United Sioux
                           Tribes and its Other Programs ($43,650 Questioned).
 

4


The Field Offices were established to accomplish JTPA Program activities as it all relates to training assistance and services. The purpose of the field offices in salaries and benefits as defined in JTPA guidelines. Furthermore, the JTPA field office was not set-up for any cost sharing polices or expenditures.

All activities of the JTPA field office was primarily functions of the program and any other functions offered by the state or BIA program were determined based on eligibility by our staff for referrals. We, United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation, determine by documentation filled out in the presence of the client to make his request for supportive service of cash payments to him. It is determined that the client cannot pay for those services, his request is legitimate as determined by the intake officer to continue training assistance to insure his supportive service needs are met.

 
5

The amounts questioned are reasonable and have been determined and documented by the process described above.

Finding 4.     Unallowable Payroll Costs ($10,901 Questioned).

As previously stated, the Executive Director serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors at which time, he is on twenty-four hour call. The Executive Director in the Articles of Corporation papers state the Executive Director handles all Corporate activities for the Board of Directors. The Executive Director is the personnel manager for the Corporation and he enforces all personnel policies which includes the Board of Directors decisions that is delegated to him under their authority.

Since, the Board of Directors hires and fires the Executive Director directly, he must take Corporate actions either before the Board or the President of the Corporation for their approval. The accumulated leave above the 240 hours for all other employees will be discontinued and they will be placed on Use or Lose leave procedures.
 

6


The Department of Labor accepted the negotiated Indirect Cost rate including the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the collected indirect cost rate is included and losses its identity. The Board of Directors of the United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation first determines the policies for the corporation and their decision is carried out by the Executive Director. JTPA does not fully fund its share of the indirect cost and so other programs help keep a positive cost balance. Therefore, there is no relationship between indirect cost and JTPA because annual leave payment was never charged to JTPA.

The question of the individual, who was hired to collect and develop a job development bank and also collect data to be analyzed for increasing the JTPA program development. She was located in Lincoln, Nebraska and told us she would be moving to Pierre, South Dakota. She did come and make arrangements at Capitol Bell Apartments for living arrangements. The manager of Capitol Bell apartments called our office for verification. Her office was secured by the JTPA program administrator, who worked with this lady developing the Job Development Bank and what data he wanted collected. Over a two month period, she reported her activities to the program administrator about the material she was working on. The
 

7


job development bank was for our field offices future reference for clients to placed in OJT positions. The data to be analyzed was the comparison between how many clients were placed on OJT, CSE, AWE and CRT. The data would be placed in our computers for further development to reflect a need for an increase in funding in the JTPA Program.

Closing

The staff at United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation has been operating since May 19th of 1970., When the Corporation was first incorporated under the laws of the State of South Dakota. In the same year IRS issued the Corporation a 501 C)(3) a non-profit status to receive grants and contracts for the Sioux Tribes in South Dakota who were not eligible for programs and contracts because of their status under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. In 1972, the Department of Labor requested United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation to write 108 contracts for tribes to receive manpower training act funds, which were Employment Training Act Prime Sponsorship monies appropriated by Congress, United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota testified before the Senate labor committee, Chairman Senator Gaylor Nelson from Wisconsin
 

8


supporting the Manpower Training Act. Later, United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation became the prime sponsor for the Comprehensive Employment Training Act (CETA) fund to provide training and work experience for Native American people. During United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation tenure with Department of Labor funds, there were many disgruntled employees who complained about United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation as politics began to play its part in program operations. The Sioux people display their politics openly against other Sioux people as was done lately under the JTPA program with United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation. The reservation political leaders want Untied Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation funds to go to them and the Urban Indian to go elsewhere for assistance. Every Sioux political leader uses United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation for their whipping boy to criticize our United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation. Our efforts to provide employment opportunities and training for the Urban Indian people we feel has been accomplished with the Department of Labor J.T.P.A. grant. Presently 64% of the Sioux people live off the reservation in urban areas in South
 
9

Dakota and we have over 18,000 Indian people from different Sioux Tribes living in Rapid City alone. Also, we have over 3,800 homeless Indian people in the Rapid City area and they are on the increase. United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation is expected to take care of all these Indian people coming off the Indian reservation into our urban areas around the state. Now, disgruntled employees and unhappy clients always seem to make an attempt to get even by trying to destroy the credibility of the United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation and the Executive Director. The auditors found no fraud, no ineligible client, and no other item purchased or wrong doing by the Administration at United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation. These were allegations and the investigation held by the Office of Inspector General and found nothing, We feel that with the year long investigation and audit that United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation has been treated unfairly. Also, the questioned costs has not concluded that the JTPA funds were spent somewhere else. In other words, all the grant money awarded to the Untied Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation prime sponsorship has been spent for JTPA purposes to this date.
 

10


Now that we have answered the audit in the time specified let us hope this waste of tax payer dollars is at the end. If not, than one can only come to the conclusion the Department of Labor wants to have Untied Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation file suit in Federal Court or demand a decision by an Administrative Law Judge. This information will be shared with our Senators, Congressmen and the Governor's office in case other actions need to be taken in thirty (30) days.

Sincerely,

            / s /                                                                                                       / s /
Mr. Clarence W. Skye                                                                         Michael Jandrea
Executive Director                                                                               Chairman
 

11

 Appendix B - DINAP's Response to the Audit Report

Return to United Sioux Tribes Audit Report    Return to OA Audit Reports