U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Inspector General

Audit Report


CHANGES ARE NEEDED IN ERISA
REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE
REQUIREMENTS PROCESSES

This document is a summary of a printed document. The printed document may contain charts and photographs which are not reproduced in this electronic version. If you require the printed version of this document, contact the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.

This report reflects the findings of the Office of Inspector General at the time that the audit report was issued. More current information may be available as a result of the resolution of this audit by the Department of Labor program agency and the auditee. For further information concerning the resolution of this report's findings, please contact the program agency.


Report Title:  Changes are Needed in ERISA Reporting and Disclosure Requirements Processes

Report Number:   09-97-004-12-121

Issue Date:   August 25, 1997

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) established a significant number of reporting and disclosure requirements to protect employee benefit plan participants and beneficiaries. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a performance and compliance audit of the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration's (PWBA) reporting and disclosure function.

The objectives of our audit were to answer the following questions:

A.  Is PWBA enforcing ERISA reporting and disclosure requirements and the related Federal regulations?

B.  Is the information reported and disclosed by plans used by PWBA and the plan participants?

C. Are there more economical ways to obtain the information, store it, and make it available to the public?

D. Are the reporting and disclosure requirements necessary to achieve the intent of ERISA?
 

Our audit work disclosed that PWBA was generally enforcing ERISA reporting and disclosure requirements; however, PWBA was not enforcing the reporting requirement for Direct Filing Entities (DFEs).  The DFE information submitted was:
 
(1)  not reported in a useful manner,
(2)  not monitored by PWBA for completeness and accuracy, and
(3)  not available for use in PWBA's enforcement program.
PWBA estimated at least $954 billion (41 percent)(1) of all pension assets were invested in entities that used direct filing procedures. Also, the framework for Summary Plan Descriptions (SPDs) and Summary of Material Modifications (SMMs) needed to be improved. Specifically,
(1)  PWBA was not effectively enforcing ERISA requirements for plans to submit SPDs and SMMs to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL),

(2)  PWBA did not need SPDs or SMMs to be submitted to meet its responsibilities under ERISA, and

(3)  Public and private funds were being wasted by current ERISA requirements for SPDs and SMMs.

According to our analysis of PWBA records, 59 percent of the plans filing Form 5500 annual reports had not filed SPDs with DOL as required.

Public funds ($500,000 annually) could be put to better use if regulations regarding reporting and disclosure requirements were revised to:

(1) require DFEs that file to use a standard form which can be used with PWBA's ERISA Information System ($290,000) and
(2) eliminate filing requirements for SPDs and SMMs ($210,000).
In addition, according to a PWBA estimate, private sector annual costs of approximately $2.5 million and 150,000 burden hours would be saved if Congress amends ERISA to eliminate filing SPDs and SMMs with DOL.

The reporting and disclosure requirements were generally necessary to achieve the intent of ERISA. However, the requirement to file SPDs and SMMs with PWBA were unnecessary and PWBA needed to continue its efforts to have Congress amend ERISA to repeal this requirement. This supported previous conclusions and recommendations made by PWBA and the National Performance Review (NPR).

PWBA attributed the weaknesses identified to limited available resources. Other areas and projects have been given higher priorities and resources have not been available to improve the DFE reporting process or enforce SPD and SMM filing requirements.

We recommended that the Assistant Secretary for Pension and Welfare Benefits:

(1)  Standardize DFE filing formats using the Form 5500 framework,

(2)  Incorporate DFE filings into the Form 5500 process and the ERISA Information System,

(3)  Develop procedures to identify DFEs not filing annual reports and take appropriate action,

(4)  Determine whether the filing and storage of SPDs and SMMs can be discontinued immediately to reduce costs, and

(5)  Continue efforts to seek legislative change to eliminate the requirements for SPDs and SMMs to be filed with DOL.

PWBA stated that the OIG recommendations essentially concurred in two PWBA initiatives that predate the OIG audit and did not take issue with the substance of the recommendations. They stated that the OIG audit report provided an independent confirmation that initiatives already being pursued are in the public interest and consistent with PWBA's statutory mission.

The legislative changes needed to discontinue SPD and SMM filings became effective on August 5, 1997 with the passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Public Law 105-32. Our two recommendations regarding SPDs and SMMs are resolved and closed.



1. Private Pension Plan Bulletin, Abstract of 1993 Form 5500 Annual Reports, Number 6, Winter 1997, published by PWBA's Office of Research and Economic Analysis.


[Full Text of ReportFull Text of Report ]

  [ Return to Return to Audit Reports ]  [ Return to Audit Reports (Text Only) ]